“The
‘Mahinda Chintana’, which is the vision for Sri Lanka that under
the Village Awakening Programme (Gama Neguma) facilities and
opportunities in cities will be made available in the rural
areas, to make their lives better while retaining the ambience
of the village. This is expected to retard the rate of
urbanization, and reduce the urban – rural pull factor thus
reducing the pressure on urban areas.
We are planning to
formulate a National Housing Policy that would be acceptable to
the community at large. It is of paramount importance that we
address the housing demands and aspirations of people rather
than trying to fulfill an artificial need that we project based
on traditional definitions of need. This is the basic
implementation strategy of the Village Awakening Programme (Gama
Neguma) under the ‘Mahinda Chintana’ Vision for Sri Lanka.”
This was said by
the Minister of Housing & Common Amenities, Mrs. Ferial Ashraff
addressing the 21st Governing Council session of
UN-Habitat in Nairobi, Kenya on 17th April 2007.
The 21st
session of the Governing Council of the United Nations Human
Settlements Programme (UN HABITAT) were inaugurated by the
President of Kenya, Mr. Mwai Kibaki on the invitation of UN
HABITAT Executive Director, Mrs. Anna Tibaijuka and the session
was focused on the theme of Sustainable Urbanization : local
action for urban poverty reduction with an emphasis on finance
and planning.
Ministers of Housing
and Human Settlements of 58 member countries participated this
conference including Sri Lanka.
After the
inauguration of above conference, Mrs. Ferial Ashraff further
said “ We in Sri Lanka have a long standing history of shelter
initiatives and successful implementation of such programmes.
We have been made to battle with shelter issues despite our past
records due to the prevailing in our country. To add to this
state of affairs, the Tsunami that wrecked our shores in
December 2004 left approximately 98,000 houses fully or
partially damaged. This required complete re-visiting of
existing policies and guidelines on housing and construction in
these areas, to re-build while maintaining a balanced growth in
the other parts of the country. Here, I must gratefully mention
the magnanimous support extended to us by the international
community in rebuilding.
Immaterial of the
sector, human settlement issues are more prominent among low
income groups. In urban areas, the demand for housing is acute
due to internal migration in addition to the normal urban growth
of 3%. In Colombo district and other main urban centres with
higher economic activities, there is an immediate need for more
than 75,000 housing units for the low income communities.
It is our
experience that planning and management of housing for urban low
income communities is a very complex and complicated process.
Our future policy framework that aims at planned human
settlements taking into consideration the population density,
effective land use planning and environmental sustainability,
therefore, will be an understanding and flexible one that makes
allowance for changing demands. This will ensure that our
endeavours would not end up in further proliferating vertical
slums.
The housing issue in
rural areas and estate sector in Sri Lanka is somewhat different
from that of urban areas. Almost all of the families living in
villages have a shelter, but in most cases, it barely fulfils
the requirements to be called a “house” within the traditional
definition. The concern that arises is whether the house serves
the household socio culturally and is affordable. If it does,
are we then overstating it through the eyes of the end user, not
the bureaucrat. Let us give this idea some thought in
estimating the demands in the future, taking into consideration
that security of tenure acts as a catalyst in the improvement of
housing, especially in rural areas. Using the traditional
definition, nearly 1,300,000 housing units require improvements
to make them more habitable.
The most significant
feature of the housing programmes in Sri Lanka is that they are
carried out with the community participation. In these
endeavours, we are introducing the cost – effective construction
technology, and energy saving, eco-friendly designs to suit
different climatic conditions to the beneficiaries. The
advantages of such programmes are two fold. Firstly they enable
beneficiaries to be involved in the construction of their own
house from the inception, and to have a home that is in line
with their affordability and aspiration. This results in our
ability to put up a house that is worth well over five times the
direct investment in construction of these houses.”
At the inaugural
session of this conference UN-HABITAT Executive Director, Mrs.
Anna Tibaijuka said “The year 2007 also marks the first
Governing Council session after the agency marked its 30th
anniversary in Vancouver last year at the Third Session of the
World Urban Forum. It also marked the 10th
anniversary of the adoption of the Habitat Agenda in 1996 in
Istanbul, Turkey. It is an opportune time to take stock of what
we have accomplished and to re-strategize, taking into account
the ongoing UN system-wide reform that has been given emphasis
by member States.
UN-HABITAT research
showed that across the planet the rate of slum formation was
today almost the same as the rate of urban growth. This implies
that most of the people who are migrating to cities, and who are
born in cities, are joining the ranks of the urban poor and slum
dwellers.”
Before the
inauguration of this conference, Mrs. Kumari Seljah, Minister of
Housing and Poverty Alleviation in India who was elected the
President of the 21st Session of the Governing
Council met the Minister of Housing & Common Amenities, Mrs.
Ferial Ashraff and the Sri Lankan delegation including Mr.
Dinesh Gunawardena, Minister of Urban Development and Sacred
Area Development.
18th
April 2007.